Why i will be believing that Anna Ardin is just a Liar 2020
I will be somewhat upgrading and reposting this from 2012 since the conventional news have actually guaranteed extremely people that are few the information associated with “case” against Julian Assange in Sweden. The UN performing Group ruled that Assange ought to never have already been arrested in britain in the beginning since there is no situation, with no investigation that is genuine. Look at this and you also shall understand why.
The other thing perhaps not commonly understood will there be is not any JURY in a rape test in Sweden which is a SECRET TEST. All the proof, most of the witnesses, are heard in secret. No public, no jury, no news. The only real general public component is the charging and also the verdict. There was a judge as well as 2 advisers straight appointed by governmental events. So that you never ever would get to know just exactly how clearly the situation is really a stitch-up. Unless you check this out.
You will find therefore numerous inconsistencies in Anna Ardin’s accusation of intimate attack against Julian Assange. Nevertheless the key question which leaps away I have not seen asked anywhere else – is this at me– and which strangely:
Why did Anna Ardin perhaps not alert Sofia Wilen?
On 16 August, Julian Assange had intercourse with Sofia Wilen. Sofia had become understood within the group that is swedish Assange when it comes to shocking red cashmere sweater she had used into the front row of Assange’s press seminar. Anna Ardin knew Assange had been likely to have sexual intercourse with Sofia Wilen. On 17 August, Ardin texted a buddy who had been seeking Assange:
“He’s not right here. He’s planned to own intercourse with all the girl that is cashmere night, yet not managed to make it. Perhaps he finally discovered time yesterday? ”
Yet Ardin later testified that simply three days earlier in the day, on 13 August, she was indeed intimately assaulted by Assange; an assault therefore serious she ended up being prepared to decide to try (with great success) to ruin Julian Assange’s entire life. She had been additionally to mention that this attack included enforced non-safe sex and she ended up being concerned with HIV.
If Ardin actually thought that on 13 August Assange had forced non-safe sex she make no attempt to warn Sofia Wilen that Wilen was in danger of her life on her and this could have transmitted HIV, why did? And exactly why was Ardin speaking about with Assange his desire for intercourse with Wilen, and texting about any of it to buddies, without any obvious disapproval or discouragement?
Ardin had Wilen’s contact information as well as had organised her registration for the press meeting. She may have warned her. But she didn’t.
Why don’t we fit that into a really brief survey of this entire relationship that is ardin/Assange.
11 August: Assange comes in Stockholm for the press meeting organised by a branch regarding the Social Democratic Party. Anna Ardin has provided her one sleep flat for him in which to stay as she’ll be away.
13 August: Ardin comes home early. She has dinner with Assange in addition they have actually consensual intercourse, regarding the first day of conference. Ardin later alleges this converted into assault by surreptitious mutilation for the condom.
14 August: Anna volunteers to do something as Julian’s press assistant. She sits close to him regarding the dais at their press meeting. Assange fulfills Sofia Wilen here.
‘Julian desires to head to a party that is crayfish anybody have a few available seats tonight or tomorrow? #fb’
This make an effort to look for a party that is crayfish, therefore Ardin organises one herself for him, in a yard outside her flat. Anna and Julian appear good together. One visitor hears Anna rib Assange that she thought “you had dumped me” as he got up from sleep early that early early morning. Another offers to Anna that Julian can keep her flat and come stick to them. She replies: “He can stick with me personally. ”
15 August Nevertheless during the crayfish party with Julian, Anna tweets:
‘Sitting out-of-doors at 02:00 and scarcely freezing using the world’s coolest smartest people, it is amazing! #fb’
Julian and Anna, based on both their authorities testimonies, rest once again in equivalent single sleep, and continue doing therefore for the following day or two. Assange tells police they continue steadily to have intercourse; Anna tells police they cannot. That Anna and Julian go together to, and leave together from, a dinner with the leadership of the Pirate Party evening. They again sleep into the bed that is same.
16 August: Julian would go to have sexual intercourse with Sofia Wilen: Ardin doesn’t alert her of possible intimate attack. Another buddy provides Anna to take control housing Julian. Anna once again declines.
20 August: After Sofia Wilen contacts her to say she actually is focused on STD’s including HIV after non-safe sex with Julian, Anna takes her to see Anna’s buddy, other personal Democrat user, previous colleague on a single ballot in a council election, and campaigning feminist police, Irmeli Krans. Ardin informs Wilen the authorities can compel Assange to simply just take an HIV test. Ardin sits in throughout Wilen’s unrecorded – in breach of procedure – police interview. Krans makes a declaration Assange that is accusing of. Wilen will not signal it.
21 August Having heard Wilen’s meeting and Krans’ statement from this, Ardin makes her very own authorities declaration alleging Assange has surreptiously had non-safe sex with her eight times formerly.
Some times later on: Ardin produces a broken condom to your authorities as proof; but a forensic assessment discovers no traces of Assange’s – or anyone else’s – DNA it is apparently unused on it, and indeed.
No witness has arrived ahead to express that Ardin complained of intimate attack by Assange before Wilen’s interview that is ardin-arranged Krans – and Wilen arrived ahead never to whine of an attack, but check into STDs. Wilen refused to signal the declaration alleging rape, that was used by Ardin’s friend Krans in Ardin’s existence.
It is simple that certain of a few things occurred:
Ardin had been intimately assaulted with unsafe sex, but neglected to alert Wilen whenever she knew Assange would definitely see her in hope of intercourse.
Ardin also proceeded to host Assange, assist him, come in general general public and private with him, behave as his press assistant, and rest in identical sleep with him, refusing repeated provides to accommodate him elsewhere, all after he assaulted her.
Ardin desired intercourse with Assange – from whatever motive. She “unexpectedly” came back home early after providing him the usage of her one bed flat while she ended up being away. By her very own admission, she had sex that is consensual him, within hours of fulfilling him.
She talked about with Assange his desire for intercourse with Wilen, and appears at the least to not have been discouraging. Hearing of Wilen’s concern about HIV after unsafe sex, she took Wilen to her campaigning feminist buddy, policewoman Irmeli Krans, so that you can twist Wilen’s tale as a sexual assault – really easy provided Sweden’s astonishing “second-wave feminism” rape regulations. Wilen declined to signal.
In the authorities place on 20 August, Wilen texted a pal at 14.25 “did n’t need to place any fees against JA nevertheless the authorities wished to control him. ”
At 17.26 she texted that she had been “shocked if they arrested JA because we just desired him to have a test”.
The next evening at 22.22 she texted “it ended up being law enforcement whom fabricated the charges”.
Ardin then made her story that is own of assault. As a lot of buddies knew she ended up being making love with Assange, she could maybe maybe perhaps not claim sex that is non-consensual. Therefore she manufactured her tale to fit right in with Wilen’s issues by alleging the event of this condom that is torn. However the torn condom she produced does not have any trace of Assange onto it. It really is impractical to wear a condom and never leave a DNA trace.
I’ve no trouble in stating that We securely think Ardin to be a liar. On her behalf story to be real involves acceptance of behavior which will be, within the sense that is literal amazing.
Ardin’s tale is needless to say incredibly poor, but that doesn’t matter. Firstly, you had been never ever expected to see all of this detail. Rape studies in Sweden take place totally in key. There’s absolutely no jury, as well as the government appointed judge is flanked by assessors appointed straight by governmental events. The trial will be secret, and the next thing you will hear is that he is guilty and a rapist if Assange goes to Sweden, he will disappear into jail.
Next, needless to say, it doesn’t matter evidence is really poor, as merely to cry rape is always to tarnish a man’s reputation forever. Anna Ardin has recently succeeded in ruining most of the ongoing work and life of Assange. The important points associated with whole tale being pathetic is unimportant.
By crying rape, politically proper viewpoint falls in behind the line that it’s incorrect also to consider the data. If you should be perhaps not permitted to understand whom the accuser is, how will you learn that she worked with CIA-funded anti-Castro teams in Havana and Miami?
Finally, to those of good use idiots whom declare that the best way to test these things is in court, i might state needless to say, you might be appropriate, we must trust their state constantly, fit-ups never happen, and then we should positively condemn the disgraceful behavior of these whom campaigned for the Birmingham Six.